Throughout the years, public opinion on early care and education programs for children has varied. In the 1920s, nursery schools (preschool programs) were designed to care for children from middle class families. In the 1960s, President Lyndon B. Johnson declared a War on Poverty, leading to the creation of programs to serve children from disadvantaged families (i.e., Head Start). However, prior to either of these programs was the development of kindergarten education, which served to prepare children to transition into formal schooling and to provide an extra year of education before children began working at age eleven (Laureate Education, 2018).
Current public opinion favors the original intent of kindergarten, which is to prepare children for entrance into formal education. However, we now also realize the long term benefits of providing quality early childhood care and education to all children. Research shows that children in poverty are exposed to factors that impact brain development and cognitive functioning, as well as social and emotional functioning. These children are more likely to have a parent with depression, malnutrition, trauma, abuse, and low-quality childcare. Children from low-income families are also more likely to battle chronic illnesses and mental health problems (Child Trends Data Bank, 2016).
Investing our resources to equalize the playing field for all children can lead to more positive economic outcomes. Targeting disadvantaged children and their families can reduce the achievement gap, the need for special education, and the crime rate, while also leading to healthier lifestyles and a higher investment return (Heckman, 2011). This investment is theorized to also create a better prepared and better trained future workforce, thus securing the economic future of our nation.
I hope that over the next five years, public opinion will continue to be influenced by all of the positive benefits provided through early childhood education strands of service. I hope that quality monitoring will become mandatory for all programs. I hope that educators will require more training and will in return receive higher compensation. I hope that people will recognize areas in which we fall short and advocate for stronger policies and better resources. I believe the related implications for children, their families, and our field will include an increased interest in serving in the field, better health, education, and development for children, and a more involved parenting style.
References
Child Trends Data Bank. (2016). Children in poverty: Indicators of child and youth well-being. Retrieved from https://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/04_Poverty.pdf
Heckman, J. J. (2011). The economics of inequality: The value of early childhood education. American Educator, 35(1), 31-35. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920516.pdf
Laureate Education. (2018). Historical overview of early childhood systems: Head Start/Early Head Start. [Interactive Media]. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/EDUC/6765/02/mm/historical_overview/index.html
Hi Jamie!
ReplyDeleteYou raised several important points in your post and a vision for early childhood that I share. Because Kindergarten was originally intended to support the social/emotional development of young children and prepare them for formal education, does that mean that someday preschool will also be linked to the public school system? I've heard many teachers say that kindergarten is the new first grade, but do we want that for preschool? I don't think so.. Based on our history, we can make some predictions about where our field is headed but who knows!? I am not very familiar with what it takes for a child care to be a part of their state's QRIS, but I do know that there are many in my city who do not participate. I would like to further explore requiring participation as you mentioned.. I hope that the public gets on board soon, there's so much work to be done! Great post!
Hi Jamie,
ReplyDeleteI hope the same, that the public and private sector join forces and demand universal child care for all our children. I was surprised to find out that at one time America had universal child care, it was during World War ll ( Morris, 2015). At that time there was a need and it was met, the sad part is that it did not continue after the war ended. I can not imagine where we would be if it had. Our focus today would be only on professionalism, compensation, curriculum, and perhaps some of those issues would not even exist.
I enjoyed reading your blog.
Reference
Morris, R. (3 February 2015). Free childcare in the U.S.: A forgotten dream. BBC News
Services. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31051633
Jamie
ReplyDeleteI appreciate and agree your support for quality monitoring in early childhood programs. I am currently participating in my state's quality rating system pilot and the problem we are/will run into is convincing programs of the benefits. As advocates we understand and respect the value from monitoring quality, but I have learned not everyone shares those values, even those in the field. Some programs will go above and beyond for their programs, while others are perfectly happy receiving one star, so how do we encourage all providers to strive for five starts? I am optimistic that those with high-quality will outlast the lower-quality programs, but I also hope to learn the barriers to why all programs are not equally high-quality.